Posted 22 September 2009 - 12:47 PM
You titled the thread 'Morality/Religious/Philosophical teachings'. I would cross out the last word, and replace it with discussion, or themes. Preaching is annoying, whatever the concept. Whenever writing a story with philosophical/moral//political/religious ideas in the foreground, you need to keep it in balance.
Firstly, the teachings need to be entwined with the plot. The ideas need to come out in the actions, as well as the dialogue, and the characters learn or discover these as a personal journey of character development Shelving a chapter of a book to purely discuss these ideas in dialogue is a no-no - it's got to be linked in some way to the writing, it has to flow. If you remember Eldest, the atheism preached there had nothing to do with the plot, nor did it add, or was shown through the actions of the characters, or through the outcomes of their actions. It was taught, told, preached, almost like taking notes on paper.
What I don't see a lot of, are stories which look at different sides of the arguments. Discussion, basically. Perhaps having one theme - say, Socialism (a commonly used example) - and having different characters hold different perspectives, change perspectives, as the plot makes them develop as characters and see different sides of the issue as their situations change. For example (on this theme of Socialism), perhaps having a rebellious son of a rich merchant, living the high life as a rich kid, but falls in love with a poor girl, who dies due to circumstances reflecting on the theme - lets say she is shot by someone else for living in a dangerous neighbourhood. He then disconnects himself with his family, joins a communist group planning revolution, but recoils in horror during the bloody revolution and aftermath. Simple example, but it lets all sorts of different views and ideas surface, with a simple conclusion of events.
Personally, I prefer stories which are stories, which have plot and characters, maybe a slight philosophical/moral/political/religious edge, but it doesn't focus on it. Sometimes this leads to more interesting conclusions, especially if we see characters turn bad, or aren't wholly rounded, rather than the typical 'x' is good and 'y' is bad. Characters have unique perspectives, and it's interesting to see theirs, even if it isn't completely moral, normal, or right. After all, I don't read books because they have characters who are good people, but characters who are interesting. People can make their own minds up about things whether they're right or wrong. Sometimes the story can get lost in a sea of ideas and values - though saying that, I don't like completely shallow books. It's a fine line, like Ben has said.
First Hortorian Short Story Competition
--->- Enter here -<---- Theme:Death. 1500 words. 28th March.ALL HAIL LORD XENU.
<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3